When a Degree Isn’t Enough: How AI Is Reshaping the Entry-Level Job Market

-

For decades, a bachelor’s degree was considered the safest ticket into professional employment. That assumption is quietly collapsing, and the data is hard to ignore. The labor market young workers are entering today is fundamentally different from the one their parents and even older siblings faced.

A Changed Labor Market for Young Workers

Youth unemployment among 16 to 24 year olds reached 10.4 percent in September 2025, up sharply from a pandemic-era low of 6.6 percent in April 2023. More striking than the increase itself is what it represents. For the first time in modern history, holding a bachelor’s degree no longer reliably guarantees professional employment for young workers.

At the same time, the impact of artificial intelligence has created a generational divide. A Stanford study shows that unemployment among 22 to 25 year olds in AI-exposed jobs has dropped by 13 percent since 2022. Meanwhile, older workers in roles with less AI exposure are seeing unemployment rates remain steady or even grow. Younger workers who adapt early to AI tools are benefiting, while those without access or training risk being left behind.

The New Baseline for Hiring

The definition of “entry-level” has quietly shifted. Employers are no longer treating AI literacy as a bonus skill. It is becoming a baseline expectation.

According to career site Handshake, job postings that list AI skills as a requirement have increased fivefold since 2023. Internships are following the same trend, with a fourfold increase in AI requirements. New graduates are expected to arrive not just educated, but already fluent in the tools shaping modern work.

At the same time, traditional credentials are losing some of their filtering power. Networking and internship relationships now play an outsized role in hiring decisions. Candidates who have worked directly with an organization or left a strong impression through internships, referrals, or project-based work are far more likely to stand out. Personal experience with a candidate increasingly outweighs resumes, GPAs, and even degrees.

The Inequality Problem Beneath the Surface

These shifts are unfolding against a backdrop of deepening economic inequality. Between 1989 and 2022, the top 1 percent gained 101 times more wealth than the median household, according to Oxfam. Rising youth unemployment adds fuel to an already volatile situation.

When young people struggle to find stable work despite doing everything they were told to do, the consequences extend beyond the labor market. Political pressure grows. Trust in institutions erodes. Calls for income redistribution and systemic reform become louder and harder to dismiss.

What AI Is Actually Demanding from Workers

Despite the fear surrounding automation, AI is not replacing smart and creative people. It is changing what is expected of them.

The workers who thrive in this environment are not the ones who simply know how to use AI tools. They are the ones who combine AI proficiency with critical thinking, judgment, and creativity. AI handles speed and scale. Humans are still responsible for asking the right questions, interpreting results, and applying insight in context.

The challenge for workers, educators, and employers alike is recognizing that adaptation is no longer optional. The rules of entry-level work have changed, and pretending otherwise only widens the gap between opportunity and reality.

The degree still matters, but it is no longer the finish line. It is just the starting point.

Popular posts from this blog

The Dual Faces of Technology: Enhancing and Replacing Jobs

-
Image
Automation has been on my mind a lot lately, more immediately due to a book I read , but also because of the looming reality of artificial intelligence. To understand what's involved, making the distinction between replacing technologies and enabling technologies is crucial. As we traverse the timeline of the 20th century, we observe how each type of technology has distinctly influenced employment. Automated technologies have transformed industries by replacing manual labor with machines. Consider the automated switchboards introduced in the early 20th century. Previously, telephone operators manually connected calls using physical connectors on a switchboard. With the advent of automated switchboards in the 1920s and 1930s, many of these jobs were eliminated as calls were routed through electromechanical systems. Similarly, in agriculture, the introduction of mechanical harvesters like the combine harvester in the 1930s drastically reduced the need for manual labor. These machine...
Read more

The Technology Trap: Capital, Labor and Power in the Age of Automation (Book Review)

-
Image
In his compelling book, " The Technology Trap: Capital, Labor, and Power in the Age of Automation ," Carl Benedikt Frey offers a sweeping examination of the historical and ongoing impact of mechanization and automation on society. Starting with the onset of the first Industrial Revolution, Frey deftly navigates through the evolution of technology up to the modern age of artificial intelligence, presenting a nuanced view of how technological innovations have reshaped labor markets and power dynamics. Frey categorizes technological innovations into two types: enabling technologies, like the typewriter, which enhance worker productivity without displacing the labor force, and replacing technologies, such as robotic machinery in factories, which eliminate certain job roles altogether. This distinction forms the backbone of Frey’s analysis, as he explores the varying implications of each type of technology on different segments of the workforce. The book traces a historical patter...
Read more

Deputy Product Owners

-
Image
"The Product Owner is one person, not a committee. The Product Owner may represent the desires of a committee in the Product Backlog, but those wanting to change a Product Backlog item’s priority must address the Product Owner." - The Scrum Guide There are a lot of ways in which my approach to Scrum differs from what's in the official guide, and since that document refers to Scrum as 'immutable,' let's just call what I do 'Notscrum™.' In Scrum, there is only one product owner per team. That person is the sole person responsible for the product backlog, and the person who advocates for the work to be done. In Notscrum there is one product owner, but there can be multiple deputy product owners. Here's how it works. When my program at Viacom was first forming I met with the then-director of the Library & Archive group and learned that while he set the priorities on work done, the archivists were organized in three distinct areas with a team lead ...
Read more